The whole carbon offsetting concept relies on the environmental integrity of the credits being issued, purchased and traded. This question of integrity, of the efficacy of the very offsetting activities in the first place, must be addressed if the practice is to recover its standing and forward momentum in terms of attracting investment.
Without the kind of clear guidance on standards and transparency delivered from an authoritative source like the UN, the voluntary market will remain something of a “Wild West” scenario where trading will be based on the hope of future market formalisation, rather than a genuine desire to decarbonise.
Progress is happening, however. Bloomberg reports that several long-awaited reforms in key carbon markets are likely to be delivered in 2024. In California, rising ambitions to lower emissions by 48% by 2030 versus 1990 levels, and by 85% by 2045, have put the question of carbon offsets front and centre. The need to move faster on decarbonisation is pushing lawmakers to tighten up market rules so that firms will have a clear path to participate in voluntary carbon offsets in good faith. Bloomberg expects concrete plans to emerge before the end of this year.
Lawmakers in California are looking at the problem through the other end of the telescope as well; with State Senator Monique Límon reintroducing legislation that would make it: “unlawful for a person to sell carbon offsets if they know or should know the claims made about those offsets are unlikely to be quantifiable or real.”
Both approaches – clarifying the rules for meaningful offset products as well as the penalties for trading disingenuous ones – are necessary for cleaning up the market and reintroducing stability.